/lit/ - Literature

>>14811205
You cannot really capture a woman's aesthetic in a novel-form, only the males elation at a woman, or, vice versa, the females elation at a male (though, this will be less effective). This is because women are less intelligent than men, and so are more superficial, so artforms that work through narrative primarily will not be able to capture the beauty of a woman, because when you actually write down what they speak, it sounds retarded, and when you flower what they say, it no longer speaks like a woman, and the illusion is broken. This is why other artforms, primarily visual, since women are very superficial, are more effective at capturing their aesthetic, like Bouguereau in painting (see pic related), or in movies (see pornography, which some people, in fact probably some people here, replace women with), or, coming very soon, in videogames.