/lit/ - Literature

>>19507255
no, start with reading the Bible, starting with the New Testament, pray, fast and attend Liturgy.
I have been deeply involved in esotericism and it's literally all demon worship, not worth investigating. on top of it people who get into it just go for the most basic consumerist new age stuff that's completely disconnected from any actual tradition. she probably bought all that stuff on amazon, I would be curious to read her diary, it's probably affirmations and stuff she saw on tiktok/instagram.
also, reminder that tarot (divination) is witchcraft, and God hates witchcraft

>>19507370
based

>>19297924
Start with the New Testament, in order, then the OT, in order.
The OSB is good but a lot of people prefer the EOB for the NT. Other good translations that aren't Orthodox include NASB, NRSV, NKJV, ESV and KJV.

>>18021126
In conclusion, here was a custom for Rome to act as a mediator, but this does not prove supremacy, nor infallibility, nor does it mean Rome cannot fall into heresy. The patristic sources indicate great respect for Rome, nevertheless, the strongest pro-Roman voices come from popes, from future heresiarchs, and from those like Jerome and Augustine whose doctrines would later lead to heresy and harm the Church. Meanwhile the circumstances and protocols of the Councils, the greatest authorities for doctrine even in Roman Catholicism, make it clear that the early church did not bow to the Bishop of Rome.
These supremacist delusions are probably why the Papacy feels justified in doing whatever it pleases. Maybe that's why you lost the West, and not through conquest or anything of the sort, but falling apart from within.

I will not be replying further, pseuds have wasted enough of my time. Enjoy your creeping heresy loser, but at least you have """"unity""""