/lit/ - Literature

"God", "immortality of the soul", "redemption", "beyond" -- Without exception, concepts to which I have never devoted any attention, or time; not even as a child. Perhaps I have never been childlike enough for them?
I do not by any means know atheism as a result; even less as an event: It is a matter of course with me, from instinct. I am too inquisitive, too questionable, too exuberant to stand for any gross answer. God is a gross answer, an indelicacy against us thinkers - at bottom merely a gross prohibition for us: you shall not think!

>>12551599

>like i hate woke liberal bullshit like this too but the reason for it is more complex than you might think.

I too, am a gentleman and a scholar.

>>12384741
I'm an atheist and I have never read it and I never will because of pic related.
a book that makes you that much of a reddit edgelord cant be good in any way

>>11530474
>Argues against 40 year old creationists
>Science and religion are not and never were enemies
>He's wrong about the Crusades and the Islamic Conquests as a religious battle when it was about land, resources, and power
>Look at these awful Christians in history, btw Stalin was a different atheist (religion had nothing to do with the 20th century)
>Because there are now strong counter-arguments means religion is irrational
>I can make truth claims
>Christians do not make truth claims, they're bad
>Religious upbringing is child abuse, but there's no evidence for it
>Christians change whenever they're faced with FACTS, despite the fact that all things change to make room for new knowledge
>Religion was never litteralism, litteralists are the minority yet he's always broadening the scope
>Most Christian counter-arguments are Christian
>He keeps saying Christians hold back process, but can't define process, and doesn't mention that Christians believe God can be discovered by understanding the world
>Religion is stupidity, this one speaks for itself really, it's slander and rejects thousands of years of literature
>Religion is evil and other dumb moral arguments which often just argue against Christianity as a dangerous institute
>Evolution and natural selection cannot be questiond, despite decades of it having eroded these theories to partial validity
>Muh polemics

>>11134649

>>9387485

>More of a JB Peterson kind of guy myself

>>8721964
3/10


vehemently

>>8474681

Whoa there boy!

>>8457010
>>8457029