/lit/ - Literature

>>10174037
>That one.
Yes. That is an ideology. And you could say I am consumed by it, but I honestly don't see how denying the inherent political nature of art (a different ideology, being prescribed) is going to get me any further.

>Hence the thread and the OP in question.

But my refutation is that the OP is wrong, the concerns he is concerned with haven't been lost, just synthesized with something that was previously ignored altogether. It would be something if there was no philosophical discussion on beauty and what-have-you, but there is. There is more than ever. It is not buried either. You can find a million articles critiquing a million works based on the aesthetics and feels alone, and which do not acknowledge, or plainly ignore, anything political. The proclaimed absence OP is concerned with is not absent at all.

>>9530473
>>9530463
>>9530410
>mfw determinism is correct and every arrangement of every atom across time prompts the next sequence eventually resulting in an exact repetition of everything
>mfw the eternal recurrence
>mfw Nietzsche was right
>mfw he will be right again, syphilis and all
>mfw aeons hence I will be jacking it to the same trap porn in the same room yet again
You are a god and never have I heard anything more divine.