[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14036195 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, pxlJf0H1qdjrhjo1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14036195

>> No.13819191 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, 16D89D00-D4B1-4FE7-AC67-0E290F3ECB14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13819191

Does the /lit/ quarterly accept philosophical essays as well? My friend wrote a pretty decent article on the Hegelian undercurrents of postmodernism, and the Deleuzian influence upon modern economics

>> No.13674042 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, 50940495_2201394710115510_2356068166453845892_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13674042

I want to get into philosophy but I've read just a small amount of books in general, so I don't know if I'll be able to infer most of the stuff philosophers write about. Should I try to start with the greeks or what?

>> No.13271156 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, deleuze-500x372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13271156

None of you understand Deleuze except me

>> No.13212785 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, deleuze-500x372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13212785

Does anyone actually 'understand' philosophy, or is it all just a reflecting board for our own ideas? So much of it is so abstract and slippery it seems not even the author always has a singular or 'objective' understanding of what they are saying.

I think philosophy is more akin to dance, or sex, or gladiatorial combat than the rational sciences it likes to disguise itself as.

>> No.12830728 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, deleuze-500x372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12830728

>>12826870
you should read deleuze OP

>> No.12751388 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x372, deleuze-500x372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12751388

>>12739564
I am not fond of the way he formulates his arguments
>Answer
>Questions opposing his idea
>Question for his idea
>Question of his idea
>Counterquestions to the opposing questions
It's very dirty, though he makes certain assumptions, though this is just because he is a postmodernist.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]