/lit/ - Literature

>>17024205
>There are standards in philosophy

>>16035793
There really isn't an argument against the IQ test or its methods that isn't grounded in left-wing orthodoxy. For instance, people who want to debunk IQ talk about "emotional intelligence."

I mean sure, I was a total nerd as a kid; when I was 6 years old I was diagnosed with Aspergers. I high-scored the IQ test regionally at 153, at the age of 6. I got the IQ test and the Aspergers diagnosis because I couldn't look anybody in the eyes. My parents knew that I had to learn to be more sociable however, so they got me help, and taught me to look people in the eyes, to not look at the floor when walking, they taught me how to deal with new social situations. All those things were entirely learnable because of my high IQ, I just had to overcome my fears.

Nobody can tell these days that I had a past like that, I just appear normal. It's because of my intellect that I was able to break out of my anti-social habits so easily. Also my parents believed in me, so they didn't just simply accept my socially retarded behaviour.

>>16016164
I press X to doubt on that one commie bro, just because we're flawed people who don't always act according to conscience doesn't mean we don't know who we serve in the end. Just because money, doesn't mean we are defined by money to the exclusion of anything else. You're just a cynic, that's all your "thought" boils down to.

>>15351466
This is an extremely lazy argument. You know that if someone says "I'm better than you" that statement is not refutable on the grounds that it is a priori always wrong to say "I'm better than you."

You're confusing your over-socialized morals with facts, and then seething when people disagree. Remember to be a consistent atheist, you have to agree that your morals are not facts, they are feelings that have been programmed into your pea-brain by millions of years of sheer terror at the thought of having to fend for yourself as an outcast. Therefore there is nothing less chad than caring about morals; caring about morals merely shows that you are a weak, fearful and subservient creature that can be easily reprogrammed by leaders.

In short, you have no spine, so you criticize Christians because those who control cable TV pay big money to make you think that this is the road to social acceptability. This demonstrates that you are a mentally inferior cuck, and that Christians are better than you because they at least have opinions that cannot be swayed by fear of ostracism.