/lit/ - Literature

>>16813273
>t.

>>16350160

>>16320784
Smoking does not cause cancer.

>>16072671
t. midwit repeating a reddit meme. Tobacco won't kill you.
>>16073156
Non tobacco users are weak.
>>16073572
>projection
>>16073864
The plebs drug. Lowers your IQ and memory and makes you take pleasure in cartoons. Pathetic.

>>15813720
That's exactly what it's for, and pipe tobacco is better and more varied than cigarettes. It's also healthier, and the health risk is minimal if you only smoke a couple bowls a week or less. The action of smoking a pipe is slow and measured compared to a cigaratte, it's more aesthetic and contemplative.
>>15813795
You're going to have to relight it now and then, how much depends on the blend

>>15673870
This.
>>15675431
See pic related.

>>15370573
>Smoking seriously harms you and those around you.
Citation needed.

>>15312731
Smoked and smokepilled.

>>15182632
Your loss.

Imagine being stupid enough to think tobacco is bad for you.

Here's one.

F

>>14444540
>>14445431
Smoking is not harmful in the first place. There is not a single shred of hard evidence to show that smoking causes cancer. To date, there is not a single study showing tobacco smoke causing cancer in any animal subject. Contrary to being a substance of harm, tobacco smoking is closer to a panacea than any other substance, it increases youth hormones like DHEA and testosterone, increases focus, has antioxidants like Coenzyme Q10, raises glutathione, inhibits MAO, the list goes on and lastly expands the boundaries of human cognition. Look at any list of prominent scientist or philosopher of the past 500 years; the overwhelming majority were tobacco smokers. Why wouldn't you be? It increases productivity, intelligence, and lowers your risk for Parkinson's Disease. The only reason people don't smoke is because they are NPCs that think SMOKE = BAD.

>>13740785
Tobacco does not cause cancer period. You never critically examined the evidence for yourself.

Not frightened at all, fellow tobacco smoker. I know smoking does not cause cancer. Smoking has antidepressant, nootropic and anti-aging effects and that only midwits get addicted. I will enjoy my lower risk of parkinson's disease for the rest of my life, and better writing ability while brainlets and midwits REEEEEE as to the harm. It is harmless and makes me a better writer.

>>13169368

>"coffin nails" or "cowboy killers"

NPC terms.

Smoking doesn't kill.

No but this one is.

>>12901900
Doesn't cause cancer.
Read Whitby.
Examine the evidence for yourself.

>>12891339
Tobacco smoking does not cause cancer.

>muh smoking causes cancer
Smoking does not cause cancer, period.
All claims alleging carcinogenicity stem from flawed non-randomized epidemiological studies, where the participants self-select. They seldom correct for lifestyle factors (occupational hazard, exercise, diet, alcohol consumption, etc). These are also contradicted by what are now referred to as the Japanese Smoker's Paradox studies of the late 90s and early 2000s.

There is not a single experimental study to date that shows tobacco smoking inducing cancer at statistically significant rates in any healthy test animal relative to control.
Dr. Whitby is a great resource for those who do not entirely understand the above. We still rely on the same sort of studies so his books are still valid.

>The Smoking Scare Debunked
http://wispofsmoke.net/PDFs/Whitby.pdf

>Smoking is Good For You
https://www.scribd.com/document/44685607/Smoking-is-Good-for-You-William-T-


I enjoy a bowl of pipe tobacco or a handful of unfiltered self-rolled cigarettes with organic tobacco everyday. It has only improved my health and life. I am happier and have less joint pain. It inclines the mind to contemplate deep philosophical questions.

>>12793676
>smoking bad for you because of confirmation bias!

>>12716213
He's smoking the white man's drug, brainlet.