[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.12796409 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, 1524880763620.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12796409

>> No.11256758 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, redpill on women.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11256758

>>11256701
You literally proved my point.
>Attention whore tries to orbit lonely virgins to feel good
>They try to date her
>Tells them to go fuck themselves because their ugly
All women are whores.

>> No.11066379 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, redpill on women.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11066379

>>11057999
Pic related.

>> No.3333463 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, 1345621389914.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3333463

I think we can all agree that this anon speaks the truth.

>> No.3331569 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, feminism1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3331569

>>3331452
I do so enjoy posting this image

>> No.3234204 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, feminism1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3234204

OP read an article (one of dozens) on some biased feminist website that interpreted, with no statistical training or further research, the raw data posted by this website:
http://www.vidaweb.org/the-count-2010
All of these articles are up in arms about the stats while the stats don’t tell us anything about the causal chain that lead to the numbers being what they are. Instead we get some variant of the off-the-cuff statistical inference on VIDA (also a feminist website by the way)
>”The truth is, these numbers don’t lie. But that is just the beginning of this story. What, then, are they really telling us? We know women write. We know women read. It’s time to begin asking why the 2010 numbers don’t reflect those facts with any equity.”
Every feminist website out there ate it up.
The result? A variation of this thread, over and over, at least once a day.

Oh and any article that includes the phrase “the numbers don’t lie” is lying to you.

>> No.3221331 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, feminism1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3221331

The gender of an author is irrelevant. It just happens to be that most of the books I have an interest in were written by men. If all the male authors I have read used female pseudonyms I would still have read the book, subject matter and reviews matter, the author’s gender does not.

Fucking feminists, they see the patriarchy behind every shadow and in every correlation.

>> No.3102317 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, 1345621389914.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3102317

It's time to accept the truth, ladies.

>> No.3095366 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, 1345621389914.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3095366

>>3095361
Please try and contain your rectal bleeding.

>> No.2981023 [View]
File: 36 KB, 768x361, 1345621389914.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2981023

>feminists
>anything other then a joke.
They can't win.
Nature is not on their side.
Men have the logical prowess and left brain dominance to rule a civilized world, they also have the brute physical strength and testosterone levels to rule in a primal world. Woman got the short end of the evolutionary stick, you don't see anyone complaining about how black widows are sexist because the female widow superior to the male. It's all insane, modern society is so insane it has to come to a head at some point.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]