/lit/ - Literature

>Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as becoming-oldfag.
What the fuck did Deleuze mean by this?

>To affirm is not to bear, carry, or harness oneself to that which exists, but on the contrary to unburden, unharness, and set free that which lives.
is deleuze right?

why is he so widely discussed in English and Anthro departments today but in Philosophy he has been disregarded?

Who is going to take up the philosophy king's mantle? not land he sucks

he's better

>Yet, what remains of souls once they are no longer attached to particularities, what keeps them from melting into a whole? What remains is precisely their ‘originality’, that is, a sound that each oneproduces, like a ritornello at the limit of language, but that it produces only when it takes to the open road (or to the open sea) with its body, when it leads its life without seeking salvation, when it embarks upon its incarnate voyage, without any particular aim, and then encounters other voyagers, whom it recognizes by their sound.
he was our lad all along

so...is he our new poster boy? i mean i much prefer him over hacks like dfw or peterson desu