[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.17819924 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, maths_logic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17819924

>>17819810
found it

>> No.16524078 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, math6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16524078

>> No.15412916 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, 1545470341092.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15412916

>> No.15209335 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, math logic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15209335

Here's a relevant chart. But if you just want to understand simple logical operands, then first chapters of pretty much any logic textook would suffice. It's really one of the easiest topics in mathematics, imho.

>> No.14678147 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, Logic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14678147

>> No.13401633 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, logicguide.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13401633

>> No.12874769 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, 1545470341095.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12874769

>> No.12830472 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, 1543817670179.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12830472

From what I understand about logic and game theory, which is very little because I'm a philosophy noob, your comments seem reasonably true, OP. Perhaps you should work through this chart (see /sci/ wiki for game theory).

This SEP entry is relevant: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-games/

>> No.12725350 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, 1545470341095.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12725350

>> No.12305868 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, 1545470341095.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12305868

>> No.12248965 [View]
File: 2.65 MB, 1766x4567, 1543817670179[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12248965

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]