/lit/ - Literature

>>12656445
desu there's nothing wrong with it. A book will usually be shit if any of these apply

>The Author's Last Name is over twice the size of the title
>The text on the cover is embossed or textured
>The front cover depicts a couple making out
>The front cover is a photograph depicting some meme vocation like rancher or doctor
>The front cover has particle effects
>The back cover mostly consists of reviews
>The back cover talks about the author instead of the book

Any others?

In an interstice, an internecine altercation alters agents at the altar engaged by an agony, now known as the "aegean agon against the asians". Unallied and unalloyed against a game of flagrant gallantry, the gentry's entry entails that any entreaty be treated by betrayal. To rail but royally tomorrow on hoards of moors; us organized in rows and thrown into the throes of a war all aware of our weariness and armoured by amorous rustics with caustic prepossessions and propositions to dispossess us of our disparate dispositions and posit a position of procrustean standing in our miens. Menial men only matter en mass and a mantle amasses as missives addressed to mistresses are missed and misgivings are stressed by a fomentation of fiction of our figures forgetting

>>12444340
I'm reading Finnegans Wake

>>10810204
At least you own a shelf

>>10775713
>Sun represents the Son of God or Jesus who Mersault hates

>>10742918
Did anyone, such as Max Brod for instance, think to tell him that the physical properties of apples don't allow them to penetrate materials?

>>10728805
Its not likely but I don't feel its especially unlikely either.

How's that novel going /lit/. Finished your drafts?