/lit/ - Literature

>>20737432
>effects

>>20669300
>gnostic turns marxist in the span of 2 posts

>In a 2008 interview, Carlin stated that using cannabis, LSD, and mescaline had helped him cope with events in his personal life.[69] He also stated several times that he had battled addictions to alcohol, Vicodin, and cocaine,[70] and spent some time in a rehab facility in late 2004.[71] Although born into a Catholic family, he vocally rejected religion in all of its forms, and frequently criticized and mocked it in his comedy routines.[72] When asked if he believed in God, he responded, "No. No, there's no God, but there might be some sort of an organizing intelligence, and I think to understand it is way beyond our ability."[73]
Pagans never learn

>>20604988
>ABSOLUTE AND TOTAL BRO TIER
>they see you as apostatic heretics

>>20479393
>>chaucer
>no
ohnononono anon literature is NOT for you my dear

Imagine when generation alpha grows up. They'll have no idea what's reality and what's not.

>>20389362
>he still thinks he's winning

>>19707306

>>17882272
Poetry is not based on rhyme retard

>>17870944
>report a marxist professor to the marxist authorities
Are you stuck in the 90s anon?

>op bumping his shitty diagram every few hours

>>17592661
>likes camus
>thinks he can possibly offend someone

>>17569200
Best /lit/ trip

>>17507348
>he fell for it

>>17458322

>>17458711
>thou shalt commit adultery

>>17456762
>been disproven due to modern anthropology

>>17421545
>german

>>17277234
>only white women and a black token guy

>>17151784
>tripfag thinks the thread is about political parties and GOP = conservatism

>>17078243
>anon just finds out communists only exist through censorship

>>17026618
>stochastic
Had the words mixed up, my bad. I meant non-stochastic. Transposing the free, indetermined agency of the subject into the realm of determinacy by calling it 'random' is objectifying what's inherently subjective. I don't see how the subject as random -- that's to say incomprehencible with regard to causal reasoning -- erodes the responsibility of the subject. This guy's reasoning appears to me like "things merely happen therefore there is no responsibility," which surreptitiously slips the subject into a garb of objectivity, which it's not. Obviously there's no responsibility in the singularity of the "objective" event -- The free will issue is an issue to *me*, the free subject, not of the universe and certainly not society at large, because I'm responsible for myself, whatever that is.

>>17026737
>This is sort of like what Nietzsche argued
I can see the similarity. Only thing that grinds my gears about Nietzsche and every post-nietzschean thinker of the left/post-whatever kind is that they deny the metaphysical unity of the subject, a sleight of hand that leads to what I'd call 'unsavory' moral conclusions.

>>16953946
>no one was actually homophobic/racist. Old /b/ which was overwhelmingly left-anarchist.

>>16945725
>so stupid he believes fake graphs