/lit/ - Literature

>>22975658
archeology is a primary source. Its a thing that was there. If you take a look at the evidence itself.
>>22975758
Thats me, im the brainlet. I read primary sources all the time. Im reading through the chronicles of Jean Froissart right now.

You are a defeatist. You can read primary sources, and like I said refer to secoundary and tirtiary sorces like theory and overviews as mere secondary reference material. In fact I would encourage it. helps you to be an actual critical human bean. (you are a bad bean, or a bean on its way to badness, I can tell).

>>20379368
Actually same wtf