/lit/ - Literature

>>16920970
>If men needed only to be concerned with sex-love and no longer with property and inheritance, then monogamy would come naturally.

is this the left's version of the libertarian 'all monopolies are actually because the government tries to intervene bro, get rid of government and the corporations will naturally balance eachother out!' myth?

>what about the onlyfans economy? and millions of young women claiming they are 'seizing the means of production' by whoring themselves? what about the recent turn to 'polyamory' and total degeneracy and sex obsession? what about the proliferation of prostitution and porn in late capitalism? sex tourism? all of these come from libertine permissiveness
>uhhh thats actually because capitalism, if you had REAL libertine permissiveness without capitalism but with a PROLETARIAT then it would naturally balance out, trust me bro just keep accelerating the permissiveness and the balance will happen, don't listen to the libleftists telling you it's also what they want

I'm a literature professor at a HYPSM-caliber university. I live at academic conferences and post here when I'm not busy. I have sifted through the entire catalogue of Ernest Cline's works for the past 24 hours. In order to ensure proper vigilance and attention to detail, I consumed 200 mg of Adderall spaced out in a bi-hourly schedule. I also have been microdosing LSD for the past three years. I can unequivocally say that there is absolutely nothing profound in any of these Ready Player One threads. They are insubstantial at best, and outright exaggerations bordering on slander at worst. It would likely be in everyone's best interest to focus on more pertinent issues as opposed to getting lost in a web of obfuscation and resentment. Given the intense mental output of thorough investigation, it is essential that one rest to rejuvenate neural productivity. I suggest going to sleep and completing at least 3 REM cycles before reassessing any further literature.

>>15581144
checked