/lit/ - Literature

>>16836932
People are pretty sick of elaborating and being met with 'No u' or 'You just don't like Brandon' every time you and others bring this up.
There have been multiple times where we have said Brandon is robotic in tone, juvenile in description - especially in character even though it's more obvious with his action, and ultimately lacking in the skill required to write given the medium of a novel. He's better suited for visual outlets given how loose and tell his writing tends to be.

>But all these things about how I see Sanderson books as movies in my mind
Literally any book can do that.
You can read Winnie the Pooh sans images and see a movie.

>inb4 the reply to this is 'that's not a good enough response'
It's a paraphrasing of the thousands of responses before, which were met with "Nah." or "You just don't like him".
Getting to the point where we can recognise whose typing what now.

My own take and sort-of-not-but-kind-of related to the prose; He wears his vidya inspiration a bit too clearly, and his reliance on in-book tutorials on how his magic systems work reads more like a rebbit post or something you'd see on fandom wikis.
He relies heavily on the idea of "awesome" with massive flash and no substance outside of set piece instances where convenience demands there to be something to extend a book by 200 pages for no reason.
With the kickstarter and his youtube channel; It's becoming clear he wants to make videogames and anime. Not write books.
I find him an alright dude though.

>>15908247
Fuck no.
I wouldn't have written 4 books if that was the case.
Fuck off with your laziness or pursue another dream.

You (and probably some other anons) always complain about this shit.
Do something about it or stick to reading other people's work.