/lit/ - Literature

>>19105562
sure we do, big guy

>>16255209

>>16222187
No, they all have claims to the original Church but the Roman Catholics have the strongest ties because Saint Peter was the first Pope

>>13589749
You didn't really refute anything I said. You just replied with a strawman.
Your reply is a joke, just like your church.

No. Palamism is heresy.

>>12827417
Are you retarded?
>But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles. Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies AD 189
>With a false bishop appointed for themselves by heretics, they dare even to set sail and carry letters from schismatics and blasphemers to the Chair of Peter and to the principal church [at Rome], in which sacerdotal unity has its source"
St. Cyprian, Epistle to Cornelius AD 252
>In the city of Rome the Episcopal chair was given first to Peter, the chair in which Peter sat, the same who was head — that is why he is also called Cephas — of all the apostles, the one chair in which unity is maintained by all. Neither do the apostles proceed individually on their own, and anyone who would [presume to] set up another chair in opposition to that single chair would, by that very fact, be a schismatic and a sinner. . . . Recall, then, the origins of your chair, those of you who wish to claim for yourselves the title of holy Church"
St. Optatus, The Schism of the Donatists AD 367

There are countless other examples that mention Petrine primacy, but these are some examples that explicitly mention Rome.
Just more proof that internet ortholarpers don't actually read the Church Fathers. You faggots watch a couple Jay Dyer videos and decide to become Eastern Orthodox.

>>12720567
You are embarrassing

Threadly reminder that the Catholic Church is the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church founded by our Lord Jesus Christ, and Eastern Orthodox are schismatics.

Feels good to be papist! After all, there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church!

>>12524638
Do you know why they reject the Immaculate Conception? Because The Catholic Church teaches it. At this point, the eastern orthodox will try to be as unroman as possible without becoming protestant (which they are pretty close to anyway)
And don't even mention the filioque! Its an easy trap to see whos a LARPer and who actually knows Church History. I've seen orthos accuse the Catholic Church of actually believing that the Holy Spirit is generated by both the Father and Son, and I've seen others claim that the Spirit is not proceeded through the Son at all! Really, any ortho who thinks the filioque is a theological issue and not a ecumenical issue just shows themselves to be the historically illiterate and ignorant LARPers they are.