/lit/ - Literature

>>21718257
Whether or not there was an entity that booted up this reality is a yes or no question. There is a correct answer. It is decidable. And so some of the consciousnesses immersed in this reality believe that they have the correct answer and wish to argue the matter. There are repercussions for the fact of having large numbers of consciousnesses immersed in a reality believing that there is no thing outside of this experiential data stream and no unseen intelligence working behind the scene. This philosophy produces a sort of quality of consciousness, which is generally LOW in quality..

>>21644129
>t. I have no argument
You are an NPC and can not conceive of standing outside of algorithm and syntax to derive pure meaning and purpose. You are not an Aryan as Gödel was. He was an Aryan genetically but also with regard to metaphysics, which is to say he had the noble outlook. Your outlook is jewish which got quintessentially finally manifested in the vienna circle jews, which was a school of though which attempted to end Aryan idealism. They failed. Gödel was an adjacent to them but held contrary views with regards to metaphysics and theology. Gödel ended up being right, and the jewish anti-metaphysical enterprise crumbled. And your personal enterprise as an agent of evil will likewise fail.

What did he mean by this?