/lit/ - Literature

>>16672499

they are called laws you idiot

>>16651539

> So we are to omit this entire segment? If we omitted this, why would we even assert that increasing the amount of times fat people are visited would improve their chances of receiving their reward?

Nobody is asserting this, they just want them to have equal chances at trying to get the reward.

>This doesn't even remotely improve fat people's chances of succeeding or getting their reward, since if we omit what you described to be a bias, then they would be visited just as much as fit people and their outcomes would be true to their real productivity, i.e. the amount of games they win.

That's the point Einstein, making it reflect their real productivity by giving them more equal opportunity, jfc

What you keep saying won't happen is what's called Equality of Outcome, try and get the concepts straight before going on your race and culture rants.