/lit/ - Literature

>>20707977
>cannot fathom that more than one person is talking to them
you're not saying anything interesting and I'm not back peddling [sic] anything because that was my first message in this reply chain. also if you're concerned with "dark aesthetics" then yeah, you are missing out. not that I think puerile views on aesthetics like that should be what hinges enjoyment since it's the type of behavior people should grow out of if they have any capacity to be receptive to culture, and not because one type presumably [Mogs] another type in [repelling normies]