/lit/ - Literature

>>18980332
Of course, I was basically repeating what you said in my metacode. I see why it sounded that way.

I'm surprised how much we agree.

>>18980505
>If I were immanent to nature...
Precisely, you get it. Now being a "spectator of constraints" is a pretty basic point, even Hegel recognizes it, but the point is that this spectatorship is not the spectatorship of a God-mechanic tweaking his Creation from the inside.

I'd hesitate to use the word "universality": not a Universal Man, but generic man(in-man). But I'm just being a stickler. You get it.

>the separation would be fully enacted...
Let's say your immanence is a "performance" (NOT a performation: feeding the escape hatch's blueprint back into the power-system) which will be consummated by death. Jesus, what are we are we talking about here? A luminous Mainlander? A whitepilled Philosophy of Redemption?

>nothing provides sufficient anything...
Precisely. You get it.

>to be a Real...
Yes, to possess no likeness is another way of saying I am Undecidable... I am exempt from the intrinsic decidability of the World. Yes: the One is cloned, the One does NOT clone me. I am not a protrusion of the One, an advancement of its inner reality, no Plotinus here.

The One is generic, not universal. Universality implies an identity whose content is of the world. Genericity (?) is just identity without content, or a content that is PURE identity (an Identity unburdened by the sausage casing of a Oneness).

>The library card that is gnosis...
Lmao, yes. Yup. I wouldn't equate the One with the totality of libraries - remember, the One is utterly inaccessible, foreclosed, Without-Principle.

>what is the library of all libraries...
Two options (this is where I diverge from Laruelle): 1. The World as the total Mixture, simply the most comprehensive Circle of Evil. The Cartesian Angel is simply the non-ontological.

2. Or, the LoL as the Sun proper, and the World/Mixture is just a stagnant locale within the library. Salvation, escape (the Cartesian Angel) is simply a repressed possibility coming outside our "local" wing, which has the same function as a non-ontology.

>Does this imply Evil...

Yes. Light stagnating or being bled by and bleeding INTO the cytoplasm of the cell-as-Logos.

Continued.

>>15599333
based trips of ascendance

>muh guenon, whitehead, deleuze

>not tiantai buddhist ontology, fechner, and Iamblichus

kek why this is board so slow?

To be present as X is to not be X, but such that this not-X is showing itself only as X. To be X is to exclude non-X but only in such a way as to necessarily involve non-X, which can only be done by showing itself exclusively as X.