/lit/ - Literature

>>13294820
>This is a good example, have more?
There are countless examples of Thorn being wrong. I honestly do not believe he holds truth as having any particular value.

Again in his video on Antifa, Thorn argues that not violently suppressing fascist movements is a form of appeasement. (I advise listening to the section starting 38:06 to understand exactly Thorn's point.) Appeasement means, in the sense that he brings up, roughly "a diplomatic policy of making political or material concessions to an aggressive power in order to avoid conflict".

Is affording fascists the exact same rights we afford everyone else a political concession? Is it a material concession? No? Then it's ridiculous to call it a form of appeasement.