/lit/ - Literature

>>23281052
I think that you have forgotten to argue for your position or to refute the argument to which you initially replied >>23279565

You simply claimed the opposite (namely that evil is "positive" whereas good is "negative" - which I take as stating that not"evil" is the privative term, but rather "good").
You have not demonstrated any confusion of senses. As far as I see it, you mentioned that if metaphysical evil were a privation of goodness or being, you would not know off the hook how to distinguish between different types of privations. But this shouldn't be taken to be some criticism of the privational theory of evil as much as it tells about your lack (!) of understanding of the teleological structure of the natural world.