/lit/ - Literature

>>4208365
This one's a bit more conversational (duh)
It sounds like her friend needs to move out of kansas

>>4208386
I know it's a bad habit. consider the following
>be hanging out with mean bitch of a homeless girl
>has NOTHING good to say
>"You should buy me beer because I'm an alcoholic"
>Needs to talk to girl
>"It's ok, I'll be nice"
Excuse me, m'lady
pic related

That's what I think of

Your bookmark just fell out

The Joke is that all the torture and mashign of teeth is .. poh fuck it. It was a massive middle finger to the church and the idea of a loving god.

Who the fuck allows this shit to happen?

8/10, OP... I can't believe it, but this thread has 90 replies and people actually believe you.

I guess I'm not surprised. One time on /s/ I started an "ask a former porn actor anything" thread and it got a bunch of replies and I answered a bunch of questions and people actually believed I did porn. I can't believe anons are this vapid.

It's so pathetically easy to just come on lit and say you're an MFA student who fucked Harold Bloom.

>Occupation: MFA student at an Ivy League university (will not specify.)

Well, you don't need to. You're at Yale if your story is miraculously actually true. That's where Bloom is.

Everyone look up Yale MFAs and find the most hambeast looking one. Ha.

>>1943595
>>1943595

i forgot my sage?
no i didn't.

and no you were badgering him to get on repeatedly

>>1913780
>>1913780

>oh tom harper listened to those bands? let me head over to his last.fm and check out what albums...
>A-Z list of his artists
>no Die Antwoord
>ooooooookay...
>head to M
>no MaxNormal...

hurrrrrrrrrrrrrm

DO YOU KNOW HOW TO USE THE SPOILER FEATURE?

Guess that's what I get for asking 4chan... Let me rephrase my topic. Can I have some *advice*? And no "Quit writing." shit, if you want to hate on me, keep it to yourselves.

>>1692603
>>1692603

NIGGER, WHAT?
1. This is an outrageously stupid non sequitur.

>hrmm because lit theory doesn't really have an equivalent in art, lit theory is a crock of shit.

2. Anyway, there is so much theory in art, I almost think you have to be trolling. A person couldn't be so stupid. How do we define art? What is art for? Is literature art?

3. What is this drivel you are spouting about "intent"? You're arguing a central focus of theory, and YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT. There are entire schools of thought, developed by people much smarter than yourself, which argue this idea.

Basically, your argument about art (which somehow translates into an argument about literature--or rather, doesn't) is that art is strictly an aesthetic enterprise. That's fine, but this argument is an engagement in theory.