/lit/ - Literature

Why don’t Christcucks ever present Pascal’s argument for Christianity as the one true religion? It’s always “lol read the book”, but they are always willing to present the wager itself without proving the foundation it relies on. You could present Pascal’s wager without it, but then it’s simply an interesting probability problem, not a logical reason for the existence of God. If Pascal’s wager does not prove the existence of God, then why would atheists be BTFO? Are Christcucks just, dare I say it, seething?