[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21715216 [View]
File: 94 KB, 1028x1496, page_1-3633984989.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21715216

>wants to become an anglican priest
>goes to ww2
>"oh nooo how could the nazis be so ebil god is dead :(("
>becomes an academic
>"if God is dead I shall fix the world with my groundbreaking theory of justice!"
>WE SHOULD MAXIMIZE THE BENEFIT FOR THE WORST CASE POSSIBLE NOT FOR THE AVERAGE CASE!
>that's it
>lefties go nuts
>best philosopher of the century, hands down
>later lefties turn on him because he didn't talk about race and women
This is almost as baffling as Nietzsche's popularity. So tell me, what am I missing regarding this great hero of the socialists? I already know the method by which he got to that conclusion ("original position"), but, in practice, a method is as good as the outcome it produces, and the outcome was that simple social theory I already outlined.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]