/lit/ - Literature

>>17250901
sup

>>17250929
no

>>17250860
you know, making categorical statements that simply aren't true and don't even apply to the person you are speaking to does not improve your credibility

>>16894564
especially in this first experimental round, i've intentionally left the prompt fairly open--i've encouraged only originality of thought and quality of argument. this has included the possibility of creative submissions as well.

my own idiosyncratic judgment is the basis of this first round. depending on its popularity, i intend to include more judges in the future--at which point, some type of "rubric or metrics" would be necessary and made transparent.

feeling taschen-y
might delete later, idk