/lit/ - Literature

>>18382777
I clearly stated that I don't hate women. I actually really enjoy women, but my point is that you cannot convince me that following the path of a woman leads to anywhere of goodness for a free man. When women assume control, we see the same routine collapse of the social order into a kind of obese-communard-slave caste society with malnourished and "whipped" males who live mostly for trivialities. Every guy knows at least one of their old pals who fell in love with a "woman" who completely warped his personality and turned him, more or less, into a husk of his former self. That isn't love, nor is it intimacy.

Do not presume to understand me when you're making such ridiculous assumptions. I never made a claim regarding their intelligence, I made a claim regarding the direction that their intellect brings them. We saw this already. It is the "default mode" of life: a communal hut of 20 morons eating off the floor worshipping fat obese cultic statues with the mother-in-law whipping the family and the husband diverting all his money to the wife (a common practice in feminized Asian countries).

You have to understand clearly, the brief gasp of air that was early Rome or the era of Conquistador's is a flash in the darkness of life. For most of humanity and history, men lived like cattle - domesticated and whipped by fat womyn matriarch's who lead society into a dump. And then along comes a storm of free men who set it all ablaze and the cycle repeats. When we learn that we don't need to play the game of the cycle and that we can live in harmony with one another through understanding our needs and necessities, only then will we be able to "reach for the stars". Until then, and as we can see already happening, expect nothing more than an overpopulated Oriental-communard-feminized existence of unrepentant mediocrity.