/lit/ - Literature

>>17525682
People who attempt to claim Nietzsche for the contemporary right or contemporary left or contemporary anarchists (who care a lot more about whining to whichever group they see as holding power and demanding equality for everyone than they do about living without rules) are retards who do not get even close to understanding him. The problems that Nietzsche had with our philosophies remain unaddressed, he did hate and would hate all of the groups I previously mentioned. If Nietzsche hadn’t gone completely mad from being a coomer and instead was flung forward in time to be with us, he would be the same cantankerous autist who’s standards no ideology or philosophy met that he was then, because nobody has solved nihilism and nobody will until we move on from the essentially Christian morality of the left wing post-enlightenment philosophies and the reactionary pagan fascists.
>inb4 slave moralists and edgy stirnerites so steeped in nihilism that they can see literally nothing else attempt to prove me wrong by denying present reality and reductively denying everything respectively.

>>17323094
Imagine following any of those three

>>16626270
She’s the ultimate humanist, reducing everything to muh feelings.
Trying to partition off the bad stuff into liberalism or Marxism is an exercise in ignoring the underlying problem, which is moral humanism. It’s values are based in outdated understandings of our reality that even humanists don’t believe in anymore, you can’t be an honest humanist unless you do not believe in evolution, evolution refuted humanism.

>liberal
American spotted. Liberalism is at this point an old tradition which has been "proven right" by its success.

>>16597388
All humanist theory is shit