/lit/ - Literature

They only became good once they saw the nazis were retards. Should have listened to the master from the beginning.

>>19111543
>Here too is a nihilistic outer skin – hygiene, shallow cults of the Sun, sport, cultivation of the body, in brief: an ethos of sterility unworthy of consideration, just as the present age is generally characterised by a strange discrepancy between the strict succession of facts and the moral and ideological foundations accompanying them.
It is one of the worst expressions of nihilism.

There's only one answer.

>write the best takedown of the bourgeoisie
>throw in all economics fags with them
>toss anarchists and suffragettes out with the marxists
>pretend to be friends with Hitler but call him a jewish nigger behind his back
>make libs and wehraboos seethe to this day
how can one man be so based yet ignored?

Someone posted about The Glass Bees and his fiction so I wanted to discuss it.
Here's one of the posts:

>All of his fiction is good. On the Marble Cliffs is probably the only story of his that’s any better than “just good”, but all of his fiction is pretty good. He never published anything that I would say is bad, or even mediocre. I actually think it’s a little unfortunate that he was so philosophical. He wrote a book later in life called “On Authors and Authorship” or something to that effect, where he endorses apoliteia as a principle for authors and authors and says that the muse is stronger when an artist isn’t political. Yet, he was very political for most of his life. Even if you could suggest that his later writings endorse an apolitical orientation, it does it in a way that’s almost exactly political. He never really disabused himself from his philosophical and political interests. I wish he had been an author of fiction as fiction first and foremost at some point, but I don’t get the sense he ever achieved that and that’s unfortunate.