/lit/ - Literature

>>21786166
Critiquing Marx without having ever read Marx means his opinion is about as worth listening to as your angry uncle when he's over for dinner.
A random fourth year philosophy undergraduate student would unironically be better read than Peterson in many of the subjects he tackles.
Watch a video where he talks to one of his peers that he respects (like John Vervaeke) where he isn't on the defensive. When he's actually humble and open to saying he isn't familiar with so-and-so's work, you realize how many massive gaps the guy has, like admitting he hasn't really read Deleuze. Which is fine for you and me - but this is the guy who is so certain that postmodernism neo-marxism is evil. He hasn't read any postmodernists or marxists!