/lit/ - Literature

>>7228603
>We should have gladiator events again like they did in Rome.

>>7215801

The difficulty with secular socialism, at least conventionally with central planning and so on, is that it puts the entirety of economics into secular control which would totally exclude religious considerations. Therefore Christian socialism is entirely as realizable as secular socialism, yet totally incompatible with it.

Memedank grows danker with every post.

>Jesus never existed

>>6775530

They need Milbank instead of all that Nazi garbage.

Traditionalism is modernist garbage, appealing to things like "enlightened absolutism" or, in your case, an ontology of violence tracing back to Hobbes, the original liberal.

Time for you to read "Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason"

Which of the seven deadly sins do you have the most problems with, /lit/?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indifferentism

And the Quran has condemnation of Christianity built into it.

>everyone ought to be an Unitarian Universalist
Literally, no. This doesn't even apply to atheists who are sympathetic toward religion.

Secularists need to get their head on straight.

According to Milbank, there are two rigorous definitions of God, that of Plontinus, which ended up becoming dominant in the late Middle Ages, and that of Proclus, which he thinks is actually where classical theologians like Augustine and Aquinas are coming from and allows for the greatest potential for social critique. He actually ties the discrepancy into different philosophical conceptions of property, one he says is required for capitalism and even for the secular world to have been possible.

>>6596860
Nietzsche was BTFO by John Milbank

Any thoughts on Milbank's explanation of his change from being a "flaccid Anglican" and "pantheistic", to becoming a serious Orthodox, Catholic Anglican?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRemJU5mTPc