/lit/ - Literature

>NOOOOOOOO WHAT DO YOU MEAN IM GETTING REPLACED BY PAJEET???

>>13216093
>code monkey nigger trying to condescend over anyone

embarrassing!

should STEM apes be given rights? do they deserve to be treated as humans?

>>12369873
imagine still shilling for an over-inflated academic bubble in 2019

stemniggers are the lawfags of the 21st century

>>11097880
STEMbeasts are eternal incels though

You're not on /sci/, kid

We are more interested in fundamental questions, that's why we read Zizek, Land and MacDonald instead of scientificist garbage from Hawking or Richard Dawkins

>>10620908

Know your place STEMlords.

Anyone else miss /fitlit/? I really think if that had lasted we would have gotten rid of all the protestants, fedoras, frogposters, redditors, and /pol/cucks that constantly run every thread into the dirt.

>Your height
>Your favorite work of literature
>Your least favorite work of literature

Go!

daily reminder

So, /lit/, I know this debate is kinda endless, but what field would you consider superior, human science or natural science. Who would you consider smarter, someone that has affinities for natural or human science? Who is smarter, the smartest humanist or the smartest naturalist?

So, /lit/, I know this debate is kinda endless, but what field would you consider superior, human science or natural science. Who would you consider smarter, someone that has affinities for natural or human science? Who is smarter, the smartest humanist or the smartest naturalist?

>arrive in America
>try to speak Esperanto with the locals
>not only are they monoglot, they don't speak a word of the new lingua franca
'Muricans everybody...

>One cringes to hear scientists cooing over the universe or any part thereof like schoolgirls over-heated by their first crush. From the studies of Krafft-Ebbing onward, we know that it is possible to become excited about anything—from shins to shoehorns. But it would be nice if just one of these gushing eggheads would step back and, as a concession to objectivity, speak the truth: THERE IS NOTHING INNATELY IMPRESSIVE ABOUT THE UNIVERSE OR ANYTHING IN IT. - Thomas Ligotti

STEMlords BTFO

who are some other writers that despise STEMfags?

Do you prefer continental philosophy because it has insights analytic philosophy does not have, or merely because there's a lot more literature involved in it?

>>6913074

ergo sum

more like

sum fEROlicious attitude huh ? ? ?

>>4373948