/lit/ - Literature

>>12930486

Why though.

>>12930494

>using some dirty word when faced with truth

I just want to know what's the purpose of writing solely for yourself.

>architecture

Servile art, can't compete in the category of fine arts so I'm going to exclude it.

>music

The only art that reach the schopenharian will, or, kantian thing-in-itself.

>literature

The only art that can explore the depths of human soul and it's outspread

>painting and sculpture

Most quick effect in art being the ones who can be admired in a few seconds. There's indeed a discussion about who's the best among these, specially in italian renaissance. The discussion is called Paragone and it's headed by Leonardo and Michelangelo. I personally think sculpture is more complete because the sense of touch presented in it.

>cinema/theater

Cinema is consider the most complete of the arts because includes theater, painting, literature and music in it. But it can not explore the depths of human soul because we only have the external emotions of the actors. Theater, on the other hand, can only be throughout a stage full of spectators and with an interactive dynamic, being more heated and powerful than cinema

>dance

irrelevant.

My order is:

Literature
Music
Sculpture
Painting
Theater
Cinema
Dance

basing it in what is most heartwarming. But doing an order of what is most close to the truth of the spirit:

Music
Literature
Painting
Sculpture
Cinema
Theater
Dance

I've a podcast about it, but it's in portuguese. Feel free to listen to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgRAtsy7zq0&t=219s

And i'm sorry about my rusty english.