/lit/ - Literature

>>22636897
Well, you obviously have spent more time thinking on this than I have. I just want to note that I have not seen actual engagement on JBP threads in quite some time. It is usually just shit flinging. On that note, here are his 12 rules. The mark of the charlatan is not that the rules themselves are fundamentally unsound, but that they are bait for a trap of further fallacies that are not directly found within the rules. He surely is a man of details, and the devil is in those details. The way that he says that he will not be boxed in reminds me of Socrates boxing in Protagoras. The fault of Protagoras was not that let his position be defined, but the position that he allowed to be adhered to him. Peterson has chosen the slimy route of insisting on not having a position.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/aKWU5wJEdVA