/lit/ - Literature

>>11587378
>1. your attitude/worldview etc etc is why you will never be christian, or likely anything more than "spiritual but not religious" (in reality spiritually dead but doesn't want to look shallow)
You surmised all that on the basis of my having asked a question?

>You won't be getting any genuine divine revelations though any purely rational discussion of christian theology, because as you are you won't understand it and you have nothing of value to add to such a discussion so no one capable would bother having it with you.
Articulate what it is specifically that precludes you from engaging in a purely rational discussion as opposed to thumbing your nose while you jerk yourself off.

>If you have no intention of trying to change 1. you are never going to be Christian, you will never understand Christianity, so you can look elsewhere to satisfy your ego or stay still here and keep getting frustrated.
>Your attitude is why you aren't a Christian
>I can't tell you what's wrong with your attitude because despite being a member of God's elect I spend my time shitposting on a Russian Jezebel forum
>If you have a problem with my refusal to actually identify what is wrong with your attitude, that's just because you have a flawed attitude, see step 1.
Sure thing, Descartes.