/lit/ - Literature

>>23472156
>Strive towards Communism
>That was created by jews
>That was ran by jews
>That is celebrated by jews
>That is, even now, disproportionately advocated by jews

I suspect the only real reason Communism views Fascism as its deadly enemy is that at its core Fascism wants the jew dead.

>>23466894
>Wittgenstein is widely considered to be the best Western philosopher by many, and mid-career contradicted his base assumptions completely.
I've not read much of him, but as I said I'm sure rare exceptions do exist especially when dealing with complicated subjects such as he was.

>Nietzsche contradicts himself perpetually in all of his books
Not at all, to a modern reader he does. But when taken broadly and embracing those darker aspects Nietzsche wrote about, but never actually described, it lacks any serious and meaningful contradiction.

>The field of science is just people contradicting the assumptions of their earlier work. Thought evolves and error-corrects
Science is not an abstraction. Philosophy is.

>There's nothing wrong with it. Only the stupid fail to change, the stupid and the stubborn
Reddit mindset.

Hatred of the jew is one of the oldest and most widespread forms of literature.

>>23258552
All Tomorrows

>>23261267
Kushiel's Dart.

>>23263307
Always With Honour.

>>23179801
Have you ever considered that the reason nobody cared when your people were turned in to fertilizer was the actions of bankers, usurers and money-lenders?

>>22762096
Why do economic forces cause the black to shoot and rape the woman they just robbed? And why do these same economic forces affect other races?

>>22681543
>why?
Because it is not the yee-haw, action-driven account of military life that people think it is. It is a boring, polemic from a boring author self-insert from an author who is famous for self-inserting himself in to his boring books.

>The opening scene where ricos squad is a man short and he has to pull someone to safety before the evac boat leaves begs to differ.
The genocide of the skinnies is not exciting, interesting or engaging. Neither is the end conflict.

>But moreover you're missing that part of the books appeal is its impact on the genre as a whole and its pro-military philosophy.
I read it as neither pro- nor anti-military, the vast majority of the book is an accurate depiction of the burden of leadership. Hence why it is a dull and boring book for people explicitly seeking military science-fiction. People want Armor.

>The entire 40nigger franchise is built on plagiarizing other series and turning their writings into copyrightable plastic toys. Reading them makes you a consooomer drone and they're only popular because youtubers shill them like crazy.
So? It is objectively true that few of Heinlein's books are engaging and exciting. I don't care for 40k, I don't care for what you think makes them popular. Some are well written and are excellent means to introduce young boys to a reading habit.