/lit/ - Literature

>>10887599
>>10887653

The only fault of "schizophrenia" is not being "schizophrenic" enough. Baroque connections between phenomena are not the exception, but their default and only arrangement. Their basal causal agent and elementary particle being you. The only revelation of this state of affairs being what you already knew. Trying to maintain narratives of objective worlds, creators, mysteries, others, etc. is the only cause of distress.

>>10772979

But Mainlander, what precedes and outlasts being is not non-being, it is you.

>>10690003

It is not a simulation since there is nothing being simulated. This screen is not a shadow of a perfect screen, nor is it an expression of the Logos or aggregate of matter. No ur-screen precedes it, nor will it transcend to an eschatoscreen. Such is the whole world, a cretinous tapestry of delirium, a nightmare to wake up from.

Remember that this is a nightmare.

>>9953133

The idea is that nothing is worth doing, neither in and of itself nor for anything else. All personhood is refraction carried out relative to Self-reflection. Pleroma being irreducible and indestructible means modes of plurality like space and time have infinitely negative value. The only meaningful aspect of Evil that must be realized is that it is pointless. This makes the nebulous Christian or Hindu idea of free will very clear, also simultaneously more comforting and more terrifying. "We" as persons are persons for no reason, though a Creator can be ascertained where Nous refracts into Logos, this is Ontological Pareidolia. There is no Mind and no Good in that process and certainly none to be found beyond it given infinite freedom. Acting to the contrary is replicating this illusion on a smaller scale, actually being the Demiurge. Refraction is incidental to reflection, perpetuating the former is its own punishment. The irreducible particle of everything, Truth and Good itself and Truth in Good itself, is not such by contractual exemption from corruption but by its own immanence despite infinite corruption. Look the other way.

>>9691758
>Veiled nonsense that categorically cannot be understood unless you choose to accept it.

But this is the Gnostic idea. Epistemological formalism being secondary to the contemplation on the refractive nightmare of the here and now. Understanding it in anything but the broadest Logical strokes, beyond which most thinking will yield diminishing returns anyway, being redundant to the utmost utility of accepting it.

>>9691758
>Veiled nonsense that categorically cannot be understood unless you choose to accept it.

But this is the Gnostic idea. Epistemological formalism being secondary to the contemplation on the refractive nightmare of the here and now. Understanding it in anything but the broadest Logical strokes, beyond which most thinking will yield diminishing returns anyway, being redundant the utmost utility of accepting it.

>>9595216

I should add that this is not to say suffering and Evil are necessary in any way. They are not. In and of themselves, as redeeming means, as counterweights of the Cosmos, as integral parts of the Eschatological blueprint, and every which way in between - they are completely worthless. As is all refraction of God. All creation, incarnation, manifestation, all existence - actual, potential, ideal - all of it is a shadow that collapses under its own futility and falsehood.

The point being that absolute immanence is maintained even in the absolute freedom of that which is immanent to stray from its own immanence.