/lit/ - Literature

The whole thing just falls apart here.
>Perfect
Let's start here. Perfection is subjective. One man's "I think this is good enough" is 4chan's "This is shit and you should die" and vice versa.
>Omnipotent
If god is perfect and has the ability to do absolutely everything, then that means he has the ability to be imperfect. However, if he cannot be imperfect, he cannot be omnipotent
>Omniscient
If god is omniscient, then that means he knows absolutely everything that's going to happen from start to finish of all of existence. If he's omnipotent, then that means he can change things different than what he sees in the future. If he's omniscient, he can't really change things and therefore not omnipotent. Furthermore, if he has the ability to change things, then he cannot be perfect as existence's start to finish would also be not perfect. If he changes an action he does in the future, he basically changes all of existence.
>Eternal, immutable
If god is eternal and omnipotent, he has the ability to not be eternal. But existence says he's eternal, so therefore, he cannot be omnipotent. If god is omniscient, he knows eternal knowledge, but that also cannot be true, since if he has the omniscient ability to know what would happen to everything else if he made himself unexist, then he'd actually be mutable, as he'd have the power to change. But he cannot change as he's immutable.

You can basically see the amount of logical paradoxes coming from this bullshit that would cause christians to cover their ears and go LALALALA NOT LISTENING TO YOU LALALALA