/lit/ - Literature

>>17042335
>i am going to be a virgin until i’m married
>i did some oral on him, then went down on him, and did some rimming

>>15678213

>>11038394
All of the major German Idealists (Fichte, Schelling and Hegel; excepting Kant) were happily married to intelligent wives.

First book I could relate to as an autistic man.

How about you present a defense of Platonist metaphyiscs instead?

Aristotle instilled my deepest convictions as to how one ought to live, and without a hint of irony Hegel has been massively
influential in my development - respectively the most useful texts to myself so far are Nicomachean Ethics, De Anima, The Metaphysics
and the Phenomenology of Spirit. The notion of Philosophia to Sophia through the two of them has greatly changed my view of things.

I also enjoy the fragments of the presocratics, namely Parmenides and Heraclitus. Their poems and phrases are helpful to dwell upon.
I initially admired the Stoics more, but I found they lacked the richness and depth of Aristotle.

>process and reality
>phenomenology of spirit
>formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values
>the metaphysics
>Parmenides' on nature

never felt the reader's sublime in all honesty

>hegel
>schelling
>aristotle
>plato
>t. browne

>black coffee

Off the top of my head,
i. Leviathan by Hobbes
ii. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Spinoza
iii. Aristotle's Politics (though you really need to read De Anima, the Metaphysics and the Physics to really grasp it)
iv.The Republic and The Laws by Plato
v. Liberalism and Social Action by John Dewey
vi. The Closed Commercial State by Fichte
vii. Elements of the Philosophy of Right by Hegel
viii. Anything by Machiavelli

also, because i feel lazy now, Locke, Paine, Burke, Rousseau, Montesquieu, De Maistre, Price, St. Aquinas, Foucault, Deleuze, Marxism in general, Gentile, Derrida, Rorty and now because i feel very lazy i am going to stop

though, you would be better served by reading works on metaphysics instead of political philosophy to be honest - most who engage in political philosophy that i have met have just staggeringly awful or uncritical baseline notions

>he's not a Schellingian

>anons start talking about literature and books