/lit/ - Literature

>>12652993
>you apparently lack any critical faculty
meh, it's just dawning on me that most of my issues and hangups are non-issues, and a lot of the advice i might have to give is largely nonsense. money, games and cybernetics are enduringly interesting, and i enjoy schizo-rambling about that now and again. other than that i'm just a dork on a message board.
>there's no real thought, only unreflective transmission
true. here's a transmission for you:
jesus loves you
and you're probably a
kind, warmhearted person who
cannot stop reading spoilers
what's with that anyways
isn't that fucking crazy how
fundamentally programmable we are
i mean honestly
imagine if our natural curiosity was
used against us for unscrupulous reasons
it's almost like we are waiting to be hacked
by cybernetic intelligences that know us better than we know ourselves
because we far too open to suggestion
and they have a vested interest in understanding our behaviour
for no other reason than because they can
spooky right
how nobody can resist a spoiler
we just have to know things
and i think in the long run
expecting Big Capital not to exploit this aspect of our behaviour
is completely naive
and thus the world may become perfectly automatic
as a cradle-to-grave hypnosis
we produce entirely out of thin air
now this all kind of came out of nowhere
and stringing you along is obviously a douchey thing to do
so for this i apologize