/lit/ - Literature

>>5717727
Yeah, this is something I'm always conscious of but find difficult to avoid. It was especially difficult in that story because I had an unnamed protagonist and the narrative lent itself to a play-by-play kind of style (he did this, then he did that, etc) with little room for divergence.

I think I did a better job here:
>>5698241
but now my writing is apparently "unreadable," "pretentious," and "dryer than 18th century legal documents" so I guess I'm doing something wrong. Also have to quit with the em dashes.