/lit/ - Literature

>>13291337
Fuck off, /pol/. Not only not every writer consciously strives to insert relevant political points in his work, it is in fact possible to hold viewpoints different from yours while maintaining sufficient coherence of thought to finish stories based on these viewpoints. I or you may consider, with solid reasoning or not, that, say, R. Scott Bakker, or Abercrombie, for whom "nihilistic" is actuallly not a fucking buzzord, are wrong about human nature, politics, the world, and everything, but that does not prevent them from completing their stories.

And if you want an unflattering explanation for why Martin's writing went downhill and dried up after ASoS that actually matches the facts see pic related.