[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22630908 [View]
File: 243 KB, 1056x1472, FunnyScreenshot_20231023-071541.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22630908

>>22630259

>no settled math anon
er. *raise hand*
thas me.

>Lobachevsky and bolyai
Thems the fellers.

>theorems in list
>theorem means math is fully settled
I see. Precluded by definition. Ok.

>learn the difference between axiom and theorem
I did refer to Euclid's fifth as a principle, not a theorem. I know they are different.

Page says an axiom is held as absolutely evident, which Euclid's fifth wasn't for 2000 years. This is what I mean by math not being stable.

>theorems still are absolutely proven tho
Per picrel: theorems are true within the parameters of certain assumptions. This is also what I mean by math not being certain: a formula that only works between (here) and (there).

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]