/lit/ - Literature

>Both chuds and trannies claim to be the counter-culture of our time.
>Yet neither represents a significant signal of the future for us.
>The true spirit of our era lies in the decadent age of digital inclusion and internet: the fostered by companies through social media, digital influencers, Tik-Tok, streamers etc.
>We're just a the antitesis and the symptoms of all that.
>Isn't truly over; It's just the absolute doing its job again, though perhaps we won't witness the synthesis.

What is going to be the next step in a hegelian view?

Now that the dust has finally settled, why did he do it?

>>17024411
Thank you!
>>17024278

Protip: write your comments in word and then paste them to 4chin, or else you might lose 2 pages of writing.

The author believes that interpreting Hegel in light of only one philosophical aspect is a bad move: Such as only understanding his social philosophy, which would make him into Marxist, even though hegel saw the process of actualizing and recognizing being as more important than that of social dialectic (which is only part of the process that develops new modes of refleksion, developing the understanding of being.)

Philosophy reigns supreme for Hegel, despite his lutheran background, he sees religion as an inferior way for conceptualizing being (because it uses imagery instead of total reason, which includes imagination [and in this way he is using the Enlightenments reason PLUS the religious imagery, he is like the power ranger of philosophers]

>Dialectical christianity

God becomes as the world evolves. He is not timeless.

Combining the two ideas, (that religion and philosophy have the same goals, but philosophy can extract the important stuff out of religion and make it explicit. And that relgion itself is depdent on being.
We can say that hegel Uses religion to understand and interpret the world, but uses philosophy to understand and interpret religion in its purest form.

So religion on its own is bad but pure secularity uniformed by history is also bad (stupid formulation but you get it)


Important words

>VERSTAND
Enlightenment Idea of understanding without imagination or feeling or historical depth

>VERNUFT
Reason, hegels borrowing of the VERSTAND along with the discarded elementss of Imagination etc

>AUFHEBUNG
up-heaval? away-growing? "hebung" means something like growth I believe. This seems to be related to religion critique (which hegel adopted from Kant)

The most cryptoAryan philosopher.

What does the fact that we might be living in a computer simulation change about philosophy? Is it compatible with Hegel's philosophy?

Anyone else write about this theory?

What 19th century philosopher should I start with? Is starting with Hegel fine, or do I need to read Kant first?
>inb4 "read this medieval or ancient philosopher first"
no fuck off

>there are people here who STILL haven't read Hegel

They are right

pic related case and point

A lot of people gloss over how dark some of Hegel's philosophy can be

"This image belongs to Spirit. Spirit is in possession of the image, is master of it. It is stored in the Spirit’s treasury, in its Night. The image is unconscious, i.e., it is not displayed as an object for representation. The human being is this Night, this empty nothing which contains everything in its simplicity – a wealth of infinitely many representations, images, none of which occur to it directly, and none of which are not present. This [is] the Night, the interior of [human] nature, existing here – pure Self – [and] in phantasmagoric representations it is night everywhere: here a bloody head suddenly shoots up and there another white shape, only to disappear as suddenly. We see this Night when we look a human being in the eye, looking into a Night which turns terrifying. [For from his eyes] the night of the world hangs out toward us."

>>12918633
Here's the complete list anon:


1. Gregory Sadler
...

And that's basically it. Get off youtube and read a book!

Thinking is all there is

Let's talk /ourguy/ Hegel.

Works:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm

What is with people calling Hegel an obscuritan? Do they expect him to just list a string of random assertions and assurances written for a 21st century American audience?

His writting is clear enough to me even if it takes a couple rereads to fully grasp.

/lit/, what are your reading / buying habits? how many books do you buy at once, how many do you read at once, how many pages do you read per day, when do you read, and so on?
i buy ~3 books in a batch and read each one from start to finish, w/o any prolonged breaks, until i'm finished with all of them, at which point i repeat the cycle from the beginning. ive been trying to read a minimum of 30 pages per day (of one singular book, since i never read more than one at a time, save for supplementary material thats supposed to go w/ another book). i tend to read 4 or 5 pages in a sitting, and then get up to relieve my ADD autistic internet addiction before returning shortly afterwards.

Can't stop thinking about him desu

All the credible philosophies are science you morons.

OK I wanna learn Hegel but the Phenomenology of Spirit is just way to much for me. Is there something else I can read that explains it more clearly?

Is it a sin for a Catholic to read Hegel? It seems like it's only compatible with Protestantism.

"God Himself is dead."
What did Hegel mean by this?


The Phenomenology of Spirit
C: Free Concrete Mind
Φ785
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phc3c.htm

What would be the synthesis of Capitalism and Communism

Its not that shocking of a revelation that spirit recognizes itself in the form of the corporeal human and communicates as a way of lifting itself up to a higher knowledge.

Is Hegelianism necessarily deterministic? Does there always have to be an endgoal of history and only one path leading up to it? Are there any thinkers who built on Hegel's conception of historical progress and did not end up with a teleological view of human history?

Go back to holding lectures in an empty classroom.
>subjective idealism
>ever