/lit/ - Literature

>>18486044

>>18417953
newfag

Read some Proudhon and Stirner if you really want to understand her

>>18358814
Based,newfags need to stop replying to butters

>>18314245
They are againts hierarchy because they can't imagine themselves at the top of one
>Foucault pic
Which work of his have you read?

>>18278913
>But Vaush also seems like an anti-communist type who doesn't like the "tankies" for being authoritarian meanies
Oh nooooo the authoritarian meanies,how dare they make up their own values and impose those values on the world around them,that's just bad okay!!!11!!
I remember watching some tranny (or girl,don't remember) telling you how to identify a fascist and it was something along those lines

Did they really start using ''fascist'' as a insult to people who want to impose their own values on others?

As far as I'm aware not many people even on /pol/ are ''fascists'' like that,since they resent jews for dominating the world(atleast acording to them).
Anyhow,since these retards have started calling strong people ''fascists'',why should anyone be insulted by this?
I don't really care about politics,but I would hate to see the uncreative masses take control,and wish that any future revolutionaries realise just how much more superior they are to the soldiers they indoctrinate to risk their lives.
>>18279726
>''''China''''' is pretty much just strong,and does not care for the weak,thus they are fascist.
So red fascists are the ''strong commies'' I understand
Note that I'm not praising the slaves for serving,but the leaders for not stopping,Xi is strong,he has power,atleast for now.
>>18281385
Have you seen that Gif of China's birthrates?
If thay can't fix those in 50 years or so I genuinely think we're going to see another warlord period,you can't sustain a state when such a large amount of the population isn't able to work.
The west has been coping with this by introducing replacement migration,and it seems to work,whether you like it or not.
As for the ''China won't be able to sell shit'' argument,I don't think that really matters,maybe I'm a pseud here idk,I don't really care.

>>18272987
Some retard will say
>are you implying Nietzsche is x or y?
No
>>18273232
kek