/lit/ - Literature

>In a capitalist society, it is the government that defines what property rights are and who gets to own property.
>maybe if I repeat it enough, it will be true

Are you capable of even an ounce of critical thinking? In our current society, the government defines what property rights are, sure. Does that mean that property rights can ONLY be enforced by people with badges on their shirts?

> In capitalism, property may be held absent of utility.

Interesting how you're just using capitalism as another word for "current society" as if it's the only way capitalism can operate. You're a hypocrite if you also say "well Russia wasn't REAL communism". Just as some strands of communism advocate a vanguard party, others don't. Capitalism can function in different ways as well. Look up the homesteading principle, many ancaps prescribe to it in order to define valid ownership of property.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestead_principle

>>2936555
>thinking survival of the "fittest" only involves physical strength

Are egalitarians this dumb?