/lit/ - Literature

>>16813737
>>16813173
I really appreciate the feedback that you have given, but the point of this in not to write a legitimate, scholarly edition of Moby-Dick. If that were the goal it would never be done on this site.
Yes, I am asking people who have never read the book to contribute, but very few actually have, and they are all shitposts. Lot's of people who have a solid understanding of this book have contributed good analyses, but good shitposts can be written by anyone which is why I am not being discriminating in where they come from.
>Anons this is a pointless endeavor. No one is going to read the whole thing, they are just going to skip to their favorite chapter.
I don't see why this is that bad of an outcome. I will personally be using this edition for my next read of Moby-Dick however.
>either humor or analysis (but not both).
Unrelated shitposts are good but the best shitposts have a slice of analysis in them
>What I do think we need is time
This project is in its 10th day, and we are still under 50% completion. How much slower would you like it to go?
>I'd like for this to be released with patience and some semblance of actual care
That is something that I'm trying to do
Of course, the best way to ensure a quality product is to write quality input for the book