/lit/ - Literature

>>16948648
>So fascists didn't exalt war?
Pic related
>they just wrote about it glowingly and actively participated in the most destructive war in human history...
This is not an argument, but only moral faggotry, everyone participated in the war.
>Mussolini wasn't an important enough figure within fascism to have any sort of defining impact on it?
>And a fascism doctrine didn't exist
I simply said that Mussolini is not the authority of what Fascism is and isn't. The doctrine of fascism is that fascism is ORGANIC and state conception of it is bound to change.
>yet Mussolini et al wrote multiple preliminary declarations?
What?
>in 1944 after the fascists had already lost the war, they changed their mind on some of their earlier views?
What views did they change their mind on do you even know? The fascists were nkt followers of the same thought, among them there were conservatives, monarchists, socialists, syndicalists. Mussolini himself was a former anarchist until he was kicked out of the socialist party for having interventionist views in the first world war (a view that wasn't uncommon for then anarchists)

Americans used to count African Americans as 3/5 of a person, does contemporary rejection of this now make you un-American?