[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22703453 [View]
File: 66 KB, 495x765, media_FvnkBW1aQAEHDhK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22703453

>>22700954
I'm a fan of Schopenhauer and not of Nietzsche. I find that a lot of philosophers are completely fine, I just avoid Nietzsche and those that draw from him like Foucault and Deleuze, but beyond that I appreciate Kant, Santayana, Burke, and some neo-schopenhauerians like Eduard von Hartmann. I think that people who internalize the Nietzschean worldview, specifically his condemnation of systematizers of philosophy from Twilight of the Idols, or the ones that embrace his implicit aristocratic normative ethics are the ones that end up finding most authors to be pretty shit. With both of those options, any work dealing with ethics in a more traditional sense, or any systemic philosophy is pretty unappealing, leaving you either with the followers of Nietzsche like Foucault, or just Nietzschean artistic output like Junger, depending on your political inclinations.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]