[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.4853088 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4853088

It has been 20 years since this was published. Thoughts? Especially on the School of Resentment

>> No.4038497 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4038497

Are anthologies like Harold Bloom's "The Western Canon" useful resources for people trying to self-educate themselves? If not, what are the superior alternatives?

>> No.3959587 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3959587

Post books and have them rated by everyone.

No discussion, no debate.

Posting a book doesn't mean you like or dislike it: it only means you want people's opinion.

Rate out of ten: 0 is shit, 10 is perfection.

>> No.3817660 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3817660

Opinions on this book? I've read maybe half of the authors that he mentions so can I start reading this? I've seen some interviews with Harold Bloom and I really like him but I'm not sure if I can get everything without having read every author, on the other hand maybe this book could enhance my experience of reading these works.

>> No.3626785 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3626785

>>3626781

Harold Bloom uses it and he's pretty fucking smart and educated.

>> No.3196319 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3196319

What are you thoughts on Blooms' Western Canon?

>> No.2625822 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2625822

Do you think the western canon should be fluid or should it be more or less static?

In other words, do you think it should be an area of debate wherein scholars argue for an author's presence in the canon (and subsequently their importance) or do you think it is already largely established and it should be left alone?

>> No.2332798 [View]
File: 330 KB, 480x552, 02.-WESTERN-CANON-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2332798

I bought this book.

Is it as the epic book it's said to be? Or worthless shit for mental masturbators?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]